Parent Advocacy Group for Educational Rights

The following are examples of letters written with regards to this issue:

June 7, 2001

Dr. Nancy Grasmick, State Superintendent of Schools
Maryland State Department of Education
200 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201

Dear Dr. Grasmick,

We would like to thank you for meeting with us on April 23rd to discuss the inherent problems in reading instruction in our public schools.  It was very considerate of both you and Dr. Baglin to give us your valuable time in order to address these issue with us.

As you know our primary concern lies in the early identification and remediation of dyslexic students who have been sorely neglected in our schools. Our organization is working toward the following goals:

  • Early identification and remediation of all dyslexic students beginning at the kindergarten level.  This requires the proper education of all psychologists, special education teachers, reading specialists, and general education teachers.  This would require complete and appropriate testing of all students identified to be at risk.
     
  • The four reading courses mandated by the Maryland State Department of Education should explicitly state the content to be covered within each category.  This would ensure that schools of education provide a depth of meaningful knowledge, including the structure of the English language, current brain research, and multi-sensory teaching techniques, within the required courses.
     
  • The State needs to develop clear and explicit teacher certification exams that demonstrate mastery of the foundational skills needed to teach reading to all students.
     
  • Special education teachers in particular need direct instruction on how to teach structured, systematic, sequential and multi-sensory phonemic and phonetic instruction to dyslexic children. More instruction in methods that do not work accomplishes nothing.
     
  • Dyslexic children should not be forced to fall between special education and general education reading programs, neither of which is prepared to educate this type of learner.  Proper remediation, not just accommodation, is needed for these students.  The emphasis here should be on early remediation.
     
  • Since the MSPAP is embedded with a great deal of "whole language" philosophy we would like to see it utilized only in the later years to measure understanding and global knowledge.  In the early years (K-3), testing needs to be based on foundation skills.  This shift of emphasis will help ensure that fewer children will be left behind.  Appropriate testing provides knowledge for successful remediation.  Omitting the scores of special education students from the MSPAP and other standardized tests' has skewed the results in such a way that the scores are deceiving.
     
  • Remediation programs for dyslexics must extend to an encompass high school.  Issues of comprehension, spelling, and written language must be continued throughout their education.  Dyslexia is a life long neurological difference that requires appropriate services throughout a child's educational experience from kindergarten through 12th grade.
     
  • The IDEA regulations supposedly ensure an appropriate education for all children.  This is difficult to implement and provide in the current crisis. We therefore object to parents being baited into due process as their only alternative when objecting to and challenging the current educational practices. The state needs to step in and develop a new model to solve this inexcusable situation rather than bankrupting families.  Since counties only cover a small portion of outside placement costs for the children requiring intensive language programs, why do the counties fight parents so hard when the State bears the burden of additional costs?  Instead of counties spending millions of dollars to fight parents in the courts, we want to see the creation of non-litigious means for parents to express their concerns.

Given  the level and severity of the current crisis in reading instruction, we see no other alternative but to lobby for standardized reading programs and material throughout the State.  The needed reform must be rooted in the scientific evidence calling for systematic, structured, sequential, phonemic and phonetic instruction for all children.  We believe, without the immediate leadership from the State Department of Education, as well as other policy legislators, millions of our children will be condemned to a life of illiteracy. By improving reading in the general education classroom fewer students will have to be tracked into "special education" thereby ensuring more resources for those in greater need. 

We would like Maryland to be in a competitive position when applying for the upcoming Federal dollars by showing a willingness to improve the current practices.  We would like to see the Maryland Language Arts Content Standards in full alignment with the results of the National Reading Panel Report 4/13/00. By reevaluating the current standards, Maryland will be implementing its full responsibility to educate all children regardless of their economic, social, or racial background.

We recognize that one of the most important solutions to the whole crisis lies in improved teacher education programs. Parents and professionals throughout the State are joining together in an attempt to create a model institute.  With a multi-disciplinary focus, it will be designed to provide a scientifically based language education program within higher education.

We recognize that policies and laws created at one point in time can become unforeseen barriers and problems down the road.  When we look at this situation collectively, there are numerous patterns that demonstrate the system is not working. We are taxpayers, comprised of parents, grandparents, educators, and administrators, and we are organizing so that our voices are heard throughout the State of Maryland to improve education for all children. The following counties have representation in PAGER as of this date:  Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Baltimore City, Carroll, Frederick, Howard, Montgomery, Prince George, Saint Mary's and Washington.  We want to be included in the processes and discussions that affect our children and their future. Do not hesitate to call on us for your support.

 

Yours truly,

Teresa Ankney              Jean Kraynick         Eileen Mummaugh

 

CC:  Dr Carol Ann Baglin
       Assistant State Superintendent
       Special Education Early Intervention Services

Top Of Page

Jan. 14, 2002

Robert Pasternack,
Assistant Secretary of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202-0498
 

Dear Mr. Pasternack.

As a former special education teacher, I am writing this letter to ask you to support legislation that will help dyslexic students.  I have taught special education students for over twenty-seven years in Maryland Public Schools. 

When I first entered Special Education in the early seventies, it was in its infancy.  However, at that time, it accomplished its goal of actually educating this population. I was thrilled to be part of it. This was before methodology was taken out and accommodations ruled the IEP process.

Since a major portion of our population is dyslexic, their learning how to read is essential. They cannot be taught by the standard methods. When I first began in this field, we, as teachers, were trained extensively in a multi-sensory, highly structured, sequential phonetic based program to remediate these students. First, however, we tested them to see if dyslexia was the cause of their not being able to read.

Once this was established, these students then received this instruction. The results were astounding. They could actually read for the first time in their lives. It was a very rewarding experience for all involved.

Unfortunately, this was short lived. Gradually, special ed teachers became no more than IEP writers and overseers of the modifications. There is no longer a test for dyslexia, and the very word does not even appear in IEP's.

If parents pay for outside testing and dyslexia is confirmed, usually nothing is done to address it in the IEP.  The majority of teachers are not even trained in the remediation process. This is NOT a question of money. It's a question of using the resources available and actually training all special ed teachers HOW to remediate specific disabilities and make that remediation process an integral part of the IEP. Early identification of this is crucial.  Unfortunately, it rarely occurs. Most IEP's are a joke.

Instead, if a child is seen as having difficulty with reading, his accommodations state that someone can read it to him or he can hear it on tape. If he's dysgraphic, they say he can have a writer.  At no time is this child given remediation. Instead, these children are being accommodated into oblivion.

I realize that the Metholology portion of the law will never again be a reality. However, because of that being removed, the individual school systems are basically given a Carte Blanc to do anything they choose. Unfortunately, remediating the specific disability is not high on their list especially with dyslexic and dysgraphic students. As a result, we are losing some of the best minds of our generation because this particular population is normally average to above average in intelligence. Their frustration level at being unable to read is intolerable. This I have witnessed first hand. The future ramifications of this frustration are unimaginable.

Is it possible to legislate some kind of mandate for reform that would make IEP's meaningful and stress remediation and early identification of dyslexia/dysgraphia on at least an equal level with modifications and accommodations? I fear that without this, special ed is never going to be true to its early promise. Throwing money at this problem is NOT the solution.  We need to use the resources we currently have available and train these educators how to identify and remediate these students so that their high school diploma is meaningful and that they can actually realize their full potential as human beings. Please do what you can to help these children who have no one to speak for them.

                                       Sincerely,       

                                     Jean Kraynick (Educational Consultant for PAGER)      

Top Of Page

Site Design By